What Not To Do When Cooking. This webcast was inspired by my amazing roommate and her inability to cook anything. We created a a webcast illustrating how to make a pancake (though hers came out poorly, as I somehow imagined it would). She also gives some pointer about what you shouldn't do when cooking and what you can do with the pancakes that you royally screw up, likes hers.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Monday, May 25, 2009
Web 2.0 Reading
I do not completely agree with this reading. For one, it states that "Web 2.0 is only accessible if excluded groups want to use it and it also benefits them." If that is the case then Web 2.0 is never going to be "accessible". By this I mean, there is no way that everything on the web is going to interest everyone, there is too much on it and people are too diverse in their interests. I, for instance, am never going to want to use the web to do anything related to sports, therefore by the articles definition the web is not accessible. Another example, my grandparents use the web only to check their email, they have no interest in doing anything else on it, so therefore it is not accessible to them either.
The website for blind individuals is a wonderful idea. The fact that they members have basically formed their own community to help one another out when using the internet is great. The second site sounds a great deal like their own personal version of a dating site almost. Though I feel this one is more of an interacting site than a dating site, I think it's also a great idea.
In general it seems like websites are becoming much easier for people with disabilities to use. The sections talking about the popularity of iPods really proves this point. To make things accessible for iPods and even cell phones is something that really helps people with disabilities.
The website for blind individuals is a wonderful idea. The fact that they members have basically formed their own community to help one another out when using the internet is great. The second site sounds a great deal like their own personal version of a dating site almost. Though I feel this one is more of an interacting site than a dating site, I think it's also a great idea.
In general it seems like websites are becoming much easier for people with disabilities to use. The sections talking about the popularity of iPods really proves this point. To make things accessible for iPods and even cell phones is something that really helps people with disabilities.
Thursday, May 21, 2009
VideoBlog
I think for my videocast I'm going to do a what not to do when cooking video. or maybe a how to video. I'm leaning towards a what not to do because my roommate is a terrible cook and I think that would be more interesting and amusing.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Student Expo
There were two projects that I found really interesting at the Expo. The art and designer part of me really enjoyed the set design piece that one of the theater grad students was working on. The communications part of me enjoyed the bilingual magazine that two students had created.
I can't recall the name of the play that the set design was for. The play had multiple versions and for OU they had taken the best sections of each version and created the play from that.
The bilingual magazine was in both Spanish and English and was geared towards women. It was designed to show Spanish Americans in a positive light. The magazine was created that some of the articles were in English and some of the articles were in Spanish. It was created like this to help Spanish Americans accept and be proud of their heritage.
*Update*
Even though I'm not allowed to comment on a piece I know about already I think can be an exception.
My all time favorite piece was a book created by one of my classmates in the graphic design department. Her book was about how people today interpret artwork of social movements over the past 22 years. I felt this piece was worth noting because it tied for first place in the art category but also because I assisted in creating it.
I can't recall the name of the play that the set design was for. The play had multiple versions and for OU they had taken the best sections of each version and created the play from that.
The bilingual magazine was in both Spanish and English and was geared towards women. It was designed to show Spanish Americans in a positive light. The magazine was created that some of the articles were in English and some of the articles were in Spanish. It was created like this to help Spanish Americans accept and be proud of their heritage.
*Update*
Even though I'm not allowed to comment on a piece I know about already I think can be an exception.
My all time favorite piece was a book created by one of my classmates in the graphic design department. Her book was about how people today interpret artwork of social movements over the past 22 years. I felt this piece was worth noting because it tied for first place in the art category but also because I assisted in creating it.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Take Back The Night Podcast
Take Back The Night week is an annual event hosted by the Women's Affairs Commission of Student Senate. The week took place between April 20-24th of this year. This year also marked 30 years of Take Back the Night week in Athens. I interviewed Robin Jones, the Women's Affairs Commissioner, to get an overview of the events that occurred during the week.
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiahe9Lxajkj-PvedKMW_s4YiIaJgArCxxMoFQG7BlzTkZVGMBcbesoeZecwIDi8C5Aj1aiJarZYqfS8eJ6CGOLaqgE9BAaHTVOkx2GyuAmOPWrtAgYQ1XiG4d2ycB_7l04amBsuU2f-X0z/s1600-h/6a00d8341c51c053ef01156f393e7f970c-pi.jpeg
BMW makes an audacious move here in its battle against rival Audi. The latter apparently erected a billboard taunting, "Your move, BMW," for its redesigned 2009 A4, on a thoroughfare in Santa Monica. Shortly thereafter, in a bit of inspired luxury auto one-upmanship, signage for BWM's M3 sedan appeared across the street with the line, "Checkmate." It's a fun, in-your-face concept that's fast earning kudos in auto and ad media worldwide. (Juggernaut Advertising, an independent agency in Santa Monica, created the response ad for BMW of Santa Monica.) Audi should just shrug it off and respond with an ad proposing "Two out of three?"
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Podcasts
Please read this article about the popularity of podcasts: http://www.5wpr.net/?p=1091
Then visit iTunes and select a podcast to listen to (genre of your choice).
What benefits do you see for the media provider and the audience? Do you think podcasts work better for certain kinds of topics or media? Do you currently regularly listen to any podcasts? Why or why not?
You will be starting your podcast assignment soon. Be thinking about what kind of podcast you might produce.
Podcasts offer all kinds of advantages for providers and for their audience. They are really nice for the fact that you can listen to a program at any time and you can listen to older programs after they've aired. Podcasts also give people the ability to listen to broadcasts multiple times and rewind the broadcast if need be.
I think that podcasts are really good for talk show type broadcasts. For instance, before David Sedaris came to OU for his lecture I looked up the podcasts that he had been on in the past to get an idea of what he sounded like and what his lecture would be like. Then I listened to a talk show where they were interviewing a comedian, Chris Doucette. I feel these type of broadcasts work better as podcasts than news broadcasts would, for instance. Since news is constantly changing they have constant updates and they are going to be constantly out of date. Besides the David Sedaris broadcasts I looked up I do not listen to any podcasts. Currently there are no podcasts that really catch my attention as something that I want to listen to on a regular basis. I also get my information about the few topics that I have a high interest in knowing about from other sources.
Then visit iTunes and select a podcast to listen to (genre of your choice).
What benefits do you see for the media provider and the audience? Do you think podcasts work better for certain kinds of topics or media? Do you currently regularly listen to any podcasts? Why or why not?
You will be starting your podcast assignment soon. Be thinking about what kind of podcast you might produce.
Podcasts offer all kinds of advantages for providers and for their audience. They are really nice for the fact that you can listen to a program at any time and you can listen to older programs after they've aired. Podcasts also give people the ability to listen to broadcasts multiple times and rewind the broadcast if need be.
I think that podcasts are really good for talk show type broadcasts. For instance, before David Sedaris came to OU for his lecture I looked up the podcasts that he had been on in the past to get an idea of what he sounded like and what his lecture would be like. Then I listened to a talk show where they were interviewing a comedian, Chris Doucette. I feel these type of broadcasts work better as podcasts than news broadcasts would, for instance. Since news is constantly changing they have constant updates and they are going to be constantly out of date. Besides the David Sedaris broadcasts I looked up I do not listen to any podcasts. Currently there are no podcasts that really catch my attention as something that I want to listen to on a regular basis. I also get my information about the few topics that I have a high interest in knowing about from other sources.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Blogging Articles
Read this article from journalism.co.uk:
"Blogging: the new journalism?"
And this blog entry from Save the Media:
Is blogging journalism?"
Write a blog entry in reaction to these two readings. Do you believe blogging should be equated to journalism? How do you believe citizen journalism has helped or hurt both the field of journalism and society-at-large? How do you think blogging has/will affect(ed) traditional modes of journalistic distribution, and how will this continue? How has it effected you (or has it)?
I agree with the second reading, that blogging is not journalism. Blogging provides an outlet for members of the community to give their opinion on something but it is not an unbiased, investigated reaction. Personally I feel that blogging is just a way for people to express their opinion in an open format, that also allows others to respond with their opinions. Blogs can provide an outlet for people who witnessed an event first hand to give information, allowing others to understand what happened, though it is still a one sided view. By no means do I feel that blogs are not credible sources, however, because quite often blogs are very accurate, siting other credible sources in their posts. I do feel that blogs are just an outlet for anyone to post their opinion on a subject, though.
Citizen journalism, to me, is just like blogs. It provides information, normally fairly quickly, though it is not always 100% factual and it is not unbiased. It is provided by the average Joe, who is more than likely untrained in proper journalism and reporting. Therefore, the information is more than likely a one sided view/report on the story. I don't feel that citizen journalism has hurt journalism or society-at-large. I believe that it is just another way to provide information, and when reading something that is citizen journalism it should be taken into account.
I think blogs have caused traditional modes of journalism to adapt and provide information much faster. It has caused them to create 24 hour news stations and online sites allowing them to announce/post immediately when something occurs. This has also caused them to do some reporting on things that are not really interesting or important subjects. I think this has caused journalism to decline a bit. However, I believe that once journalism learns to adapt to these new forms they will bounce back. I personally don't read or watch the news so I feel that for the most part I have not been effected by any of these changes.
"Blogging: the new journalism?"
And this blog entry from Save the Media:
Is blogging journalism?"
Write a blog entry in reaction to these two readings. Do you believe blogging should be equated to journalism? How do you believe citizen journalism has helped or hurt both the field of journalism and society-at-large? How do you think blogging has/will affect(ed) traditional modes of journalistic distribution, and how will this continue? How has it effected you (or has it)?
I agree with the second reading, that blogging is not journalism. Blogging provides an outlet for members of the community to give their opinion on something but it is not an unbiased, investigated reaction. Personally I feel that blogging is just a way for people to express their opinion in an open format, that also allows others to respond with their opinions. Blogs can provide an outlet for people who witnessed an event first hand to give information, allowing others to understand what happened, though it is still a one sided view. By no means do I feel that blogs are not credible sources, however, because quite often blogs are very accurate, siting other credible sources in their posts. I do feel that blogs are just an outlet for anyone to post their opinion on a subject, though.
Citizen journalism, to me, is just like blogs. It provides information, normally fairly quickly, though it is not always 100% factual and it is not unbiased. It is provided by the average Joe, who is more than likely untrained in proper journalism and reporting. Therefore, the information is more than likely a one sided view/report on the story. I don't feel that citizen journalism has hurt journalism or society-at-large. I believe that it is just another way to provide information, and when reading something that is citizen journalism it should be taken into account.
I think blogs have caused traditional modes of journalism to adapt and provide information much faster. It has caused them to create 24 hour news stations and online sites allowing them to announce/post immediately when something occurs. This has also caused them to do some reporting on things that are not really interesting or important subjects. I think this has caused journalism to decline a bit. However, I believe that once journalism learns to adapt to these new forms they will bounce back. I personally don't read or watch the news so I feel that for the most part I have not been effected by any of these changes.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Web 2.0 Reaction
Write a blog post in reaction. What are your thoughts about Web 2.0? Do you use these applications and do you think they are significant, and if so will they continue to make an impact? How can you see these technologies evolving?
Your post should be a thoughtful analysis of Mr. O'Reilly's discussion.
I believe Web 2.0 is really a strong definition of how my/our generation works. We are constantly trying to find things and connect with others in the fastest way possible and Web 2.0 allows us to do that. What's nice is Web 2.0 is more an interactive system allowing users to have a direct interaction with other users, as well as with the material they are working with. I am personally fascinated with Web 2.0 and all the uses and forms it takes. There are some forms that completely baffle me, such as Twitter. However, there is a large community that uses Twitter, thus proving that though I don't understand it other people do and use it regularly. I have a vast array of applications that I do use on an every day basis, including Facebook, Youtube, Blogspot, and Myspace. These applications, like Twitter, have a large following of users, proving that they are doing something right and something that people are interested in. These applications give people a sense of community and a sense of belonging, in my opinion. It allows users to find and connect with other people who have interests similar to themselves. They also have the ability to then interact with these people, learn about them, learn more about their interest and share with others. In the past it would have been much more difficult for someone in Athens, Ohio to meet and interact with someone in Cleveland, Ohio about deep sea diving if they'd never meet in real life. However, with Web 2.0 there is the ability to meet and interact with the person in Cleveland, in Portland, in LA and even in Hong Kong. People are no longer limited to whom they can meet and communicate with. I strongly believe that these applications will continue to exhist and function as an important part of society. They will, of course, continue to evolve and function in ways that interest people.
Your post should be a thoughtful analysis of Mr. O'Reilly's discussion.
I believe Web 2.0 is really a strong definition of how my/our generation works. We are constantly trying to find things and connect with others in the fastest way possible and Web 2.0 allows us to do that. What's nice is Web 2.0 is more an interactive system allowing users to have a direct interaction with other users, as well as with the material they are working with. I am personally fascinated with Web 2.0 and all the uses and forms it takes. There are some forms that completely baffle me, such as Twitter. However, there is a large community that uses Twitter, thus proving that though I don't understand it other people do and use it regularly. I have a vast array of applications that I do use on an every day basis, including Facebook, Youtube, Blogspot, and Myspace. These applications, like Twitter, have a large following of users, proving that they are doing something right and something that people are interested in. These applications give people a sense of community and a sense of belonging, in my opinion. It allows users to find and connect with other people who have interests similar to themselves. They also have the ability to then interact with these people, learn about them, learn more about their interest and share with others. In the past it would have been much more difficult for someone in Athens, Ohio to meet and interact with someone in Cleveland, Ohio about deep sea diving if they'd never meet in real life. However, with Web 2.0 there is the ability to meet and interact with the person in Cleveland, in Portland, in LA and even in Hong Kong. People are no longer limited to whom they can meet and communicate with. I strongly believe that these applications will continue to exhist and function as an important part of society. They will, of course, continue to evolve and function in ways that interest people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
